Homeschooling Laws vs. Parental Sovereignty

[ 4 ] August 17, 2012 |

I was recently emailed by a homeschooling father who wanted to know my thoughts on “keeping legal” with Iowa’s reporting and testing requirements for homeschooling families.  Apparently he was receiving some pushback saying that raising and teaching children have nothing to do with the state and that by doing so we may subject our children to a system that may influence what our kids may learn.

I appreciate the zeal behind the pushback.  It is a parent’s responsibility to raise and educate kids, not the states.  I appreciate the concern about who influences our kids.

I would suspect that this father is not alone in wondering about things like this so I wanted to share with my readers here what I shared with him and expand it a bit.

First we need to remember Romans 13:1- “Let every person be subject to the governing authorities.  For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God,” (ESV).

If the state came in and said, “you can’t homeschool” or “you have to teach this curriculum.”  Then we’d certainly have a case for civil disobedience.  We’re not there – yet.  Filing a CPI (Competent Private Instruction)  form with your school district and then fulfilling the supervisory teacher, portfolio or testing requirement, while not ideal, doesn’t hinder our homeschooling efforts and they don’t dictate what you teach.  Now if you’re involved in a Home School Assistance Program (HSAP) through your local school district that would be a different story.

I’d love to see Iowa’s homeschooling law changed to reflect what Indiana or Kansas have for instance, and we need to continue to work to that end.  But as Christian citizens we can’t pick and choose which laws we’ll obey and which ones we won’t unless a particular law contradicts God’s law.  I think you’d have to do hermenutical somersaults to demonstrate that Iowa’s homeschooling laws do that.

If that changes then civil disobedience can be considered, but then we also need to keep in mind we’ll be responsible for any consequences that arise as a result so that isn’t something to be taken lightly.  I recommend that all families who homeschool become members of the Home School Legal Defense Association.  They’re a good resource for questions like this, but they’ll also have your back if your right to homeschool becomes challenged by authorities who are ignorant of the law.

Tags: , , , ,

Category: Faith, Family/Parenting

About the Author ()

Shane Vander Hart is the founder and editor-in-chief of Caffeinated Thoughts.  He is also the President of 4:15 Communications, LLC, a social media & communications consulting/management firm.  He is a communications director for American Principles Project’s Preserve Innocence Initiative.  Prior to this Shane spent 20 years in youth ministry serving in church, parachurch, and school settings.  He has also served as an interim pastor and is a sought after speaker and pulpit fill-in.  Shane has been married to his wife Cheryl since 1993 and they have three kids.  Shane and his family reside near Des Moines, IA.  You can connect with Shane on Facebook or follow him on Twitter and Google +.
  • http://twitter.com/kevinsubra Kevin Subra

    Good, concise response, Shane. I’m in full agreement (as a father of a family who has continuously home schooled in Iowa for 25 years). It’s a lot easier than it used to be – we’re making progress.

    • http://shanevanderhart.com/ Shane Vander Hart

      We’re making progress as far as how people view home schooling, but I’m concerned by the push toward national standards that it could have a negative impact on us as college entrance exams gear toward them, etc.

  • Yoel

    You gotta read this article on Romans 13 if you think it has anything to do with obedience to any secular governament:
    http://www.bibleunderground.com/romans-13-series.html

    • http://shanevanderhart.com/ Shane Vander Hart

      Nobody is arguing that God isn’t the higher power, but that we are also subject to earthly authorities. I disagree with that commentator’s interpretation of that passage.

      Also what would the implication be? “No officer, I don’t need to obey the speed limit, God is my ultimate authority!”

      I’m sure that’ll go over well.